Conceptions and problems related to the academic writing of the undergraduate thesis in dental students of a peruvian university
Abstract
Objetive: To identify the conceptions and problems related to academic writing presented by a group of dental students during the preparation of their undergraduate thesis
Materials and Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out with 72 students of stomatology at the Universidad Científica del Sur (Lima, Peru). The technique used was the survey and the instrument was a questionnaire (Writing Process Questionnaire) that evaluated the dimensions of blocking, procrastination, perfectionism, innate ability, knowledge and transformation, and productivity. The scale data were analyzed through relative frequencies for each question, also analyzed through average scores.
Results: 68 students were surveyed (response rate = 94.4 %) and the frequency of responses per question showed that in the dimension “blocking” 35.3 % (n=24) agreed that they “hate writing” and 48.5 % (n=33) strongly agreed that they “find it easier to express themselves in other ways than writing”. Correlations were found between the dimensions blocking-perfectionism (r=0.712), blocking-procrastination (r=0.645) and productivity-procrastination (r=0.708).
Conclusion: Undergraduate students perceive some difficulties during their thesis writing. These are more frequent in the dimensions of blocking, perfectionism, procrastination and productivity. Scores are lower in students who present previous extracurricular writing experiences and present high academic performance.
References
Quinn CT, Rush AJ. Writing and Publishing Your Research Findings. Journal of Investigative Medicine. 2009; 57(5): 634-39. https://doi.org/10.2310/JIM.0b013e3181a39164.
Schryer CF, Spoel P. Genre Theory, Health-care Discourse, and Professional Identity Formation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication. 2005; 19(3): 249-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651905275625.
Gouvernement du Québec. Indicateurs de l’éducation. 2013.
Giraldo-Giraldo C. Dificultades de la escritura y desaprovechamiento de su potencial epistémico en estudiantes de posgrado. Revista Colombiana de Educación. 2020; 1(80): 173-192.
Burchfield CM, Sappington J. Compliance with required reading assignments. Teaching of Psychology. 2000; 27(1): 58–60.
Castro-Rodríguez Y. Satisfacción de los estudiantes con los procesos de elaboración de la tesis de licenciatura. Gaceta Médica Boliviana. 2023; 46(2):52-57. https://doi.org/10.47993/gmb.v46i2.773
Castro-Rodríguez Y, Huamán-Aguilar L, Rojas-Ortega R. Characteristics of the bachelor thesis in Dentistry, satisfaction and motivations of the students. Journal of Oral Research. 2023; 13(2023): 12-23. https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres. 2023.002
Maher D, Seaton L, McMullen C, Fitzgerald T, Otsuji E, Lee A. Becoming and being writers: the experiences of doctoral students in writing groups. Studies in Continuing Education. 2008; 30(3): 263-275.
Aitchison C, Lee A. Research writing: Problems and pedagogies. Teaching in Higher Education. 2006; 11(3): 26578.
Odena O, Burgess H. How doctoral students and graduates describe facilitating experiences and strategies for their thesis writing learning process: a qualitative approach. Studies in Higher Education. 2017; 42(3): 572-590.
DeLyser D. Teaching graduate students to write: a seminar for thesis and dissertation writers. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2003; 27(2): 169–181.
Lonka K, Chow A, Keskinen J, Hakkarainen K, Sandström N, Pyhältö K. How to measure PhD students’ conceptions of academic writing - and are they related to well-being? Journal of Writing Research. 2014; 5(3): 245–269. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2014.05.03.1
Cerrato M, Castelló M, García R, Lonka K. Validation of the writing process questionnaire in two Hispanic populations: Spain and Mexico. Journal of Writing Research. 2017; 9(2): 151–171.
Jotangiya P. Is there a correlation between PhD students’ outlooks on academic writing and their happiness, and how these attitudes are measured? IAAR Journal of Education. 2022; 4(2): 60-103.
Allahverdi M, Mohammadi E, Mohammadi Achachelooei E. Writing process conceptions: A comparative study on disciplinary-socialized and disciplinary-naïve graduate students in two academic disciplines. International Journal of Language Studies. 2023; 17(1): 117-140.
Yin Y, Parpala A, Toom A. The relationship between international higher education students’ writing conceptions and approaches to learning. Journal of Writing Research. 2023; 14(3): 421-446.
Casarin M. Escritura de tesis: dificultades, desafíos y propuestas. Revista Pucara. 2016; 27: 179-188.
Elliott S, Hendry H, Ayres C, Blackman K, Browning F, Colebrook D, et al. On the Outside I’m Smiling but Inside I’m Crying: Communication Successes and Challenges for Undergraduate Academic Writing. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2016; 43(9): 1163–1180.
Cassany D. Tras las líneas: Sobre la lectura contemporánea. Anagrama; 2006.
Ferguson T. The ‘Write’ Skills and More: A Thesis Writing Group for Doctoral Students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2009; 33(2): 285–297.
Berdanier C. Linking current and prospective engineering graduate students’ writing attitudes with rhetorical writing patterns. Journal of Engineering Education. 2020; 110(1): 207–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20368
Sala-Bubaré A, Peltonen J, Pyhältö K, Castelló M. Doctoral Candidates’ Research Writing Perceptions: A Cross-National Study. International Journal of Doctoral Studies. 2018; 13: 327–345. https://doi.org/10.28945/4103
Ochoa L, Cueva A. El bloqueo en el proceso de elaboración de una tesis de maestría: angustias y desazones percibidas por sus protagonistas. Lenguaje. 2017; 45(1): 61–87.
Henning LH. Paradox as a treatment for writer’s block. Personnel & Guidance Journal. 1981; 60(2): 112-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2164-4918.1981.tb00655.x
Paré A. Re-thinking the dissertation and doctoral supervision/ Reflexiones sobre la tesis doctoral y su supervisión. Infancia y Aprendizaje: Journal for the Study of Education and Development. 2017; 40(3): 407-428.
Álvarez M, Yániz C. Writing practices in Spanish universities [Las prácticas escritas en la universidad española]. Cultura y Educación. 2015; 27(3): 594-628. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2015.1072356
Bommarito DV. Collaborative research writing as mentoring in a U. S. English doctoral program. Journal of Writing Research. 2016; 8(2): 267–299. https://doi.org/10.17239/ jowr-2016.08.02.04
Castelló M, McAlpine L, Pyhältö K. Spanish and UK post-PhD researchers: writing perceptions, well-being and productivity. Higher Education Research and Development. 2017; 36(6): 1108–1122.
Calle-Arango L, Ávila N. Obstacles, facilitators, and needs in doctoral writing: A systematic review. Studies in Continuing Education. 2022; 45(2): 133–151.
Castro RY. La tesis universitaria. Algunos mitos, reflexiones y cuentos de terror. Lima; 2020.
Berger R. Challenges and strategies in social work and social welfare PhD Education: Helping candidates jump through the dissertation hoops. Journal of Teaching in Social Work. 2015; 35(1–2): 166–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2014.973548
Berdanier C, Zerbe E. Quantitative investigation of engineering graduate student conceptions and processes of academic writing. 2018. IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm.2018.00037
Castelló M, Sala-Bubaré A, Pardo M. Post-PhD Researchers’ Trajectories and Networking: The Mediating Role of Writing Conceptions. Written Communication. 2021; 38(4): 479–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883211027949
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. © 2024.
