Received: November 03, 2025. | Accepted: November 12, 2025. | Published online: July 23, 2026.

Radiographic Enigma: a case report of clear cell odontogenic neoplasm in the anterior mandible diagnosed by Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Enigma radiográfico: Informe de un caso de carcinoma odontogénico de células claras en la mandíbula anterior diagnosticada mediante Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico

Prarthana Sudeep Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India. http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3799-2851

Aravind Meena Shanmughan Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9733-0879

Mahija Janardhanan Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2155-4876

Indu PS Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Amrita School of Dentistry, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8300-6840


ABSTRACT: 

Introduction: Introduction: Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) is a rare and aggressive odontogenic tumour, seldom involving the anterior mandible. Case Report: This report presents an atypical case in a 38-year-old female, emphasizing the diagnostic challenges, the role of CBCT in detecting aggressive features, and the importance of considering CCOC in the differential diagnosis of anterior mandibular lesions. The patient presented with gingival swelling, and cone-beam computed tomography revealed a diffuse, irregular, expansile lesion with labial cortical perforation, thinning of the lingual cortex, and hyperdense foci. Periosteal bone formation was also noted anteriorly. Results: These atypical features initially suggested alternative diagnoses, but histopathological evaluation confirmed CCOC. Conclusions: This case reinforces the diagnostic challenges of CCOC and demonstrates the utility of radiographic evaluation for identifying aggressive features of rare mandibular tumours.

Keywords: Case report; Mandibular neoplasms; Odontogenic tumors; Cone-beam computed tomography; Diagnosis, differential; Mandible.


RESUMEN: 

Introducción: Introducción: El carcinoma odontogénico de células claras (CCOC) es un tumor odontogénico raro y agresivo, que rara vez afecta la mandíbula anterior. Reporte de Caso: Este informe presenta un caso atípico en una mujer de 38 años, destacando los desafíos diagnósticos, el papel de la tomografía computarizada de haz cónico (CBCT) en la detección de características agresivas y la importancia de considerar el CCOC en el diagnóstico diferencial de las lesiones mandibulares anteriores. La paciente presentó inflamación gingival, y la CBCT reveló una lesión difusa, irregular y expansiva con perforación de la cortical labial, adelgazamiento de la cortical lingual y focos hiperdensos. También se observó formación ósea perióstica en la zona anterior. Resultados: Estas características atípicas sugirieron inicialmente diagnósticos alternativos, pero la evaluación histopatológica confirmó el CCOC. Conclusión: Este caso refuerza los desafíos diagnósticos del CCOC y demuestra la utilidad de la evaluación radiográfica para identificar características agresivas de tumores mandibulares raros.

Palabras clave: Informe de caso; Neoplasias mandibulares; Tumores odontogénicos; Tomografía computarizada de haz cónico; Diagnóstico diferencial; Mandíbula.
CITACIÓN: Sudeep P, Shanmugham AM, Janardhanan M & Indu PS. Radiographic Enigma: a case report of clear cell odontogenic neoplasm in the anterior mandible diagnosed by Cone Beam Computed Tomography. J Oral Res. 2026; 15(1):79-87. https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2026.007

INTRODUCTION 

Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) is a rare malignant odontogenic epithelial tumour, recognized in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification for its aggressive behaviour, high recurrence rate, and metastatic potential.1

Since its first description in 1985, approximately 120 cases have been reported worldwide, mostly as isolated case reports, highlighting its rarity.2-4 CCOC occurs predominantly in the mandible, often in the posterior mandible followed by the anterior region, with a female predilection and peak incidence in the fifth to sixth decades of life.2,5 Radiographically, it typically presents as a unilocular or multilocular radiolucency with well- or ill-defined margins.6

Histopathology demonstrates a spectrum from low- to high-grade morphology, with recurrence rates reported at 41% and metastasis at 31%.7 Here, we present an unusual radiographic manifestation of CCOC in the anterior mandible of a 38-year-old female, a pattern not previously documented, to expand the spectrum of known imaging findings. Given its rarity, aggressive biological behaviour, and potential for recurrence and metastasis, each additional case contributes valuable information to the literature. The present report is important because it documents an atypical radiographic presentation of CCOC in a younger patient, thereby contributing to the understanding of its imaging features and reminding clinicians to consider this entity in the differential diagnosis of anterior mandibular lesions

CASE REPORT 

A 38-year-old female presented with swelling and bleeding in the lower anterior gingiva for one week, accompanied by pain during brushing. Her dental history revealed a root canal treatment in the same region 20 years earlier, after which she remained symptom-free until the current episode. Initial dental management involved extraction of the mobile teeth and excision of the gingival swelling under local anaesthesia, which was uneventful. She was otherwise healthy, with no significant medical, family, social, or occupational history, and reported no systemic illness or long-term medication use.

On intraoral examination, a diffuse lobulated swelling extended from tooth 32 to 42. The overlying mucosa appeared normal except for an ulcerated area with greyish-black pigmentation on the alveolar ridge. The lesion was firm, sessile, mildly tender, and irregular, without pus discharge or active bleeding. No regional lymphadenopathy was detected (Figure 1).

supernumerary tooth

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of the mandible revealed an expansile lesion involving the anterior mandible, extending from tooth 32 to 42. The periphery is irregular with illdefined borders with labial cortical perforation and thinning of the lingual cortex. A periosteal reaction was evident along the anterior aspect. The internal structure is predominantly radiolucent, inter-spersed with hyperdense foci. The lesion caused localized periodontal bone loss in relation to adjacent teeth, with widening of the periodontal ligament space and partial loss of lamina dura. No displacement or root resorption of teeth was observed, (Figure 2). Based on these imaging features, the differential diagnoses included peripheral ossifying fibroma, foreign body reaction, chronic osteomyelitis, and malignancy.

supernumerary tooth

Histopathological examination of the incisional biopsy showed epithelial islands within a vascular stroma, with some cells exhibiting clear cytoplasm. Hyalinized connective tissue containing dentinoid-like material was also ob-served (Figure 3). Immunohistochemistry demonstrated CK19 and CK7 positivity, membranous β-catenin positivity, MUC4 negativity, and a low Ki-67 index (1–2%) (Not shown). These findings confirmed the diagnosis of clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC).

supernumerary tooth

The patient underwent wide excision with marginal resection of the anterior mandible. At the six-month follow-up, an orthopantomogram revealed a stable bony defect at the symphysis with preservation of the inferior mandibular border and no evidence of recurrence (Figure 4).

supernumerary tooth

DISCUSIÓN 

described by Hansen in 1985 as a clear-cell odontogenic tumour. In 2005, 2017 and 2022, the WHO classified CCOC as a malignant odontogenic tumour due to its aggressive growth, local recurrence, and metastatic potential.1 Historically, “clear cell ameloblastoma” and “clear cell odontogenic tumour” were used interchangeably.8

CCOC typically presents as a painless, slowly progressive swelling, often for about four years before diagnosis. This case involved mild pain and swelling initially mistaken for a pulpal issue. Age of occurrence ranges from 17–89 years, peaking in the sixth decade, with a female predominance (male-to-female ratio 1:1.8).9 While the anterior mandible is a relatively common site, this case is reported because of its unusual radiographic characteristics.2

Diagnosis can be challenging due to non- specific clinical and radiological signs. Recurrence after years may reflect lesion progression and delayed detection. Radiographically, CCOC is usually radiolucent with poorly defined margins; 66.3% of cases show poorly defined lesions, and 25% well-defined ones.2,10 Additional features include cortical perforations, root resorption, and occasional soft-tissue invasion.11-12This case displayed a rare mixed internal structure, with hyperdense-hypodense areas.

Clear cells support but do not confirm CCOC diagnosis, as they appear in various odontogenic and non-odontogenic tumours. Due to atypical radiographic features and clinical history, CCOC was initially excluded from the differential diagnosis, highlighting the role of histopathology and immunohistochemistry.

Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma (CCOC) typically shows clear cells within epithelial islands and may contain hyalinized or dentinoid-like stroma. Immunohistochemical features include positivity for CK8, CK13, CK14, CK18, CK19, and EMA, and negativity for vimentin, S-100, desmin, SMA, HMB-45, CD31, CD45, and GFAP, with generally low Ki-67 and p53 expression. Molecular studies often reveal EWSR1-ATF1 translocations, aiding diagnostic precision. In our case, the tumor demonstrated epithelial islands with clear cells and dentinoid-like material.

Immunohistochemistry showed CK19 and CK7 positivity, membranous β-catenin positivity, MUC4 negativity, and a low Ki-67 index (1–2%), consistent with the low proliferative activity expected in CCOC and confirming the diagnosis. These findings highlight the importance of correlating histology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and molecular features to accurately distinguish CCOC from other clear cell–rich odontogenic or metastatic tumors.2,13

Literature shows recurrence rates of 86.7% after curettage and 29.8% after resection.14 This patient showed no recurrence after 6 months post-surgery.

Limitations

A limitation of this report is the unavailability of IHC microphotographs, as the analysis was conducted externally. However, the detailed IHC results, when correlated with the histopathological features, were sufficient to establish the diagnosis of CCOC.

CONCLUSIONS 

This case highlights an uncommon presenta-tion of clear cell odontogenic carcinoma in a female in her late 30s, involving the anterior mandible with an atypical mixed radiolu-cent–radiopaque pattern. Such variation can obscure early recognition, reinforcing the role of CBCT and immunohistochemistry in accurate diagnosis. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion and ensure wide excision with prolonged follow-up given the tumour’s recurrence and metastatic potential. Future collaborative studies are needed to better characterize long-term outcomes in this rare malignancy.

REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS 

1. Soluk-Tekkesin M, Wright JM. The World Health Organization Classification of Odontogenic Le-sions: A Summary of the Changes of the 2022 (5th) Edition. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2022;38(2):168-184. https://doi.org/10.5146/tjpath.2022.01573. PMID: 35578902; PMCID: PMC9999699.

2. Labrador AJP, Marin NRG, Valdez LHM, Valentina MP, Sanchez KBT, Ibazetta KAR, Johan B, Cesar AV, Wright JM. Clear Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma a Systematic Review. Head Neck Pathol. 2022; 16(3):838-848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-021-01383-9. Epub 2021 Oct 7. PMID: 34618301; PMCID: PMC9424403.

3. Guastaldi FPS, Faquin WC, Gootkind F, Hashemi S, August M, Iafrate AJ, Rivera MN, Kaban LB, Jaquinet A, Troulis MJ. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: a rare jaw tumor. A summary of 107 reported cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Nov;48(11):1405-1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 18. PMID: 31227275; PMCID: PMC7422703.

4. Asiri Z, Alshahrani A, Hameed MS, Assiri K, Assiri HA. Diagnostic Dilemma of Clear Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma Mimicking Various Pathological Entities: A Case Report and Literature Review. Clin Case Rep. 2025 Aug 1;13(8):e70752. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.70752. PMID: 40756 083; PMCID: PMC12317104.

5. Ullah A, Cullen C, Mattox SN, Kozman D, Patel N, Sharma S, Abdelsayed R. Clear Cell Odontogenic Carcinoma: A Series of Three Cases. Dent J (Basel). 2022 Feb 25;10(3):34. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj10030034. PMID: 35323236; PMCID: PMC8947699.

6. Datar UV, Kamat MS, Kanitkar SS, Byakodi SS. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: A rare case report with emphasis on differential diagnosis. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(2):374-377. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-1482.187381. PMID: 28643764.

7. Loyola AM, Cardoso SV, de Faria PR, Servato JP, Barbosa de Paulo LF, Eisenberg AL, Dias FL, Gomes CC, Gomez RS. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: report of 7 new cases and systematic review of the current knowledge. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015; 120(4):483-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 15. PMID: 2623 2924.

8. Werle H, Blake FA, Reichelt U, Schmelzle R, Heiland M. Clear-cell odontogenic carcinoma: a new case and long-term follow-up of an old case, and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(6):1342-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.020. PMID: 1944 6231.

9. Siriwardena BS, Tilakaratne WM, Rajapaksha RM. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma-a case report and review of literature. Int J Oral Ma-xillofac Surg. 2004;33(5):512-4. https://doi.org/110.1016/j.ijom.2003.08.006. PMID: 15183419.

10. Hansen LS, Eversole LR, Green TL, Powell NB. Clear cell odontogenic tumor--a new histologic variant with aggressive potential. Head Neck Surg. 1985 Nov-Dec;8(2):115-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2890080208. PMID: 4077550.

11. Avninder S, Rakheja D, Bhatnagar A. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma. World J Surg Oncol. 2006 12;4:91. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-4-91. PMID: 17156493; PMCID: PMC1705808.

12. Swain N, Dhariwal R, Ray JG. Clear cell odon-togenic carcinoma of maxilla: A case report and mini review. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2013;17(1): 89-94. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-029X.110681. PMID:23798837; PMCID: PMC368 7196.

13. Metrop V, Tisne-Versailles S, Murcier G, Borgnat F. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma, a rare tumor case-report and its complexity of diagnosis. J Oral Med Oral Surg. 2025;31(3):27.

14. Kalsi AS, Williams SP, Shah KA, Fasanmade A. Clear cell odontogenic carcinoma: a rare neo-plasm of the maxillary bone. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May;72(5):935-8. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.joms.2013.10.023. Epub 2013 Nov 16. PMID: 24359996.


CONFLICT OF INTERESTS 

The authors declare that there are no conflicting interests.

Los autores declaran que no existen conflictos de intereses.

ETHICS APPROVAL 

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying clinical and radiographic images.

Se obtuvo el consentimiento informado por escrito del paciente para la publicación de este caso clínico y las imágenes clínicas y radiográficas que lo acompañan.

FUNDING 

Does not have a source of financing.

Autofinanciado.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS 

Prarthana Sudeep: Concept development, study design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, data acquisition, data analysis, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, manuscript review, and served as guarantor of the work. | Aravind Meena Shanmughan: Concept development, study design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, data acquisition, data analysis, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, manuscript review, and served as guarantor of the work. Mahija Janardhanan: Study design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, and manuscript review. | Pillaveetil Sathyadas Indu: Study design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, and manuscript review.

Prarthana Sudeep: Desarrollo del concepto, diseño del estudio, definición del contenido intelectual, búsqueda bibliográfica, adquisición de datos, análisis de datos, preparación del manuscrito, edición del manuscrito, revisión del manuscrito y garante del trabajo. | Aravind Meena Shanmughan: Desarrollo del concepto, diseño del estudio, definición del contenido intelectual, búsqueda bibliográfica, adquisición de datos, análisis de datos, preparación del manuscrito, edición del manuscrito, revisión del manuscrito y garante del trabajo. | Mahija Janardhanan: Diseño del estudio, definición del contenido intelectual, búsqueda bibliográfica, preparación del manuscrito, edición del manuscrito y revisión del manuscrito. Pillaveetil Sathyadas Indu: Diseño del estudio, definición del contenido intelectual, búsqueda bibliográfica, preparación del manuscrito, edición del manuscrito y revisión del manuscrito.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

None.

No es necesario.

PUBLISHER’S NOTE 

All statements expressed in this article are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily represent those of the publisher, editors, and reviewers. Todas las declaraciones expresadas en este artículo son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no representan necesariamente las de la editorial, los editores ni los revisores.

Todas las declaraciones expresadas en este artículo son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no necesariamente representan las del editor, los editores y los revisores. Todas las declaraciones expresadas en este artículo son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no representan necesariamente las de la editorial, los editores ni los revisores.

PEER REVIEW 

This manuscript was evaluated by the editors of the journal and reviewed by at least two peers in a double-blind process.

Este manuscrito fue evaluado por los editores de la revista y revisado por al menos dos pares en un proceso de doble ciego.

PLAGIARISM SOFTWARE 

This manuscript was analyzed Compilatio plagiarism detector software. Analysis report of document ID.a120c285878776da2a32a33db 94708b47cf35d60

Este manuscrito fue analizado con el software detector de plagio Compilación. Informe de análisis del documento ID.a120c285878776da2a32a33db 94708b47cf35d60


ISSN Print 0719-2460 - ISSN en línea 0719-2479
Journal of Oral Research es la publicacion oficial de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad de Concepción, Chile. Avda, Roosevell #1550, 3er piso, Concepción, Chile.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. © 2026.