Immediate Autogenous Extracted Tooth as a Grafting Material For Fresh Socket Preservation: a Systematic Review.

  • Zurab Khabadze RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Oleg Mordanov RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Marina Dashtieva RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Ia Todua RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Julia Generalova RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Artemy Nedashkovsky RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Meri Sheroziia RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Saida Adbulkerimova RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.
  • Yusup Bakaev RUDN University, Moscow, Russia.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the use of extracted autogenous teeth for socket preservation after tooth extraction. Material and Methods: Cochrane, Scopus, and PubMed databases search was conducted to identify human clinical studies reporting the clinical, radiographic and/or histological outcomes of socket preservation techniques with autogenous extracted tooth Only studies published in English language in the last 10 years were included in the study. Results: In total, 82 articles were identified. Five articles were included in the review. They included 58 teeth that were prepared as a graft for socket preservation. The grafts derived from autogenous teeth were presented in three forms: particles, blocks and powder. The mean bone loss ranged from 0.28 mm to 0.41mm in height and 0.15 mm in width.Conclusion: Immediate autogenous extracted tooth as a grafting material for fresh socket preservation is promising for future daily clinical practice. More clinical comparative studies are needed.

References

1. Chappuis V, Araújo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):73-83.
2. Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009: 24 (Suppl.): 186–217.
3. Ten HJ, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(8):779-88.
4. Van der, Weijden F, Dell’Acqua F, Slot DE. Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36(12):1048-58.
5. Padial-Molina M, O’Valle F, Lanis A, Mesa F, Dohan Ehrenfest DM, Wang HL, Galindo-Moreno P. Clinical Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Novel Supportive Therapies for Oral Bone Regeneration. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:341327.
6. Pranskunas M, Galindo-Moreno P, Padial-Molina M. Extraction Socket Preservation Using Growth Factors and Stem Cells: a Systematic Review J Oral Maxillofac Res 2019;10(3):e7
7. Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Klokkevold PR, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, Nedic M, Jancovic S, Orsini M. Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:581-6.
8. Gross J. Ridge preservation using HTR synthetic bone fol- lowing tooth extraction. Gen Dent 1995;43:364-7.
9. Hämmerle CH, Chiantella GC, Karring T, Lang NP. The ef- fect of a deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regen- eration around titanium dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:151-62.
10. Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, Scheetz JP. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone al- lograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74:990-9.
11. Lekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Dimitrijevic B, Nedic M. Preservation of alveo- lar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable mem- branes. J Periodontol 1998;69:1044-9.
12. Zizzari VL ,Zara S,Tete`G,Vinci R, Gherlone E, Cataldi A. Biologic and clinical aspects of integration of different bone substitutes in oral surgery: a literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2016;122:392–402.
13. Bath-Balogh M, Fehrenbach MJ. Illustrated dental embryology, histology, and anatomy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2006.
14. Calvo-Guirado JL, Ballester-Montilla A, N De Aza P, Fernández-Domínguez M, Alexandre Gehrke S, Cegarra-Del Pino P, Mahesh L, Pelegrine AA, Aragoneses JM, Maté-Sánchez de Val J. Particulated, Extracted Human Teeth Characterization by SEM-EDX Evaluation as a Biomaterial for Socket Preservation: An in vitro Study. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(3):380.
15. Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley Blackwellm 2008.
16. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JA; Cochrane Bias Methods Group; Cochrane Statistical Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
17. Nasr HF, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Yukna RA. Bone and bone substitutes. Periodontol 2000. 1999;19:74– 86.
18. Nampo T, Watahiki J, Enomoto A, Taguchi T, Ono M, Nakano H, Yamamoto G, Irie T, Tachikawa T, Maki K. A new method for alveolar bone repair using extracted teeth for the graft material. J Periodontol. 2010;81(9):1264-72.
19. Shejali J, Thomas R, Kumar T, Shah R, Mehta DS, Gayathri GV. Immediate Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Tooth Root as a Block Graft in a Periodontally Hopeless Extraction Site: A Pilot Study. J Oral Implantol. 2020;46(1):41-49.
20. Kim ES, Lee IK, Kang JY, Lee EY. Various autogenous fresh demineralized tooth forms for alveolar socket preservation in anterior tooth extraction sites: a series of 4 cases. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;37(1):27. Published 2015 Sep 3.
21. Canto-Díaz M, Alobera-Gracia MA, Del Canto-Pingarrón M, Martínez-González JM. Use of autologous tooth-derived graft material in the post-extraction dental socket. Pilot study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24(1):e53-e60.
22. Minamizato T, Koga T, I T, Nakatani Y, Umebayashi M, Sumita Y, Ikeda T, Asahina I. Clinical application of autogenous partially demineralized dentin matrix prepared immediately after extraction for alveolar bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47(1):125-32.
23. Joshi CP, Dani NH, Khedkar SU. Alveolar ridge preservation using autogenous tooth graft versus beta-tricalcium phosphate alloplast: A randomized, controlled, prospective, clinical pilot study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016;20(4):429-34.
24. Ramírez Fernández MP, Gehrke SA, Mazón P, Calvo-Guirado JL, De Aza PN. Implant Stability of Biological Hydroxyapatites Used in Dentistry. Materials 2017, 10, 644.
25. Ramírez Fernández MP, Mazón, P.; Gehrke SA, Calvo-Guirado JL, De Aza PN. Comparison of Two Xenograft Materials Used in Sinus Lift Procedures: Material Characterization and In Vivo Behavior. Materials 2017, 10, 623.
26. Ramírez Fernández, MP, Gehrke SA, Pérez Albacete Martinez C, Calvo Guirado JL, de Aza PN. SEM-EDX Study of the Degradation Process of Two Xenograft Materials Used in Sinus Lift Procedures. Materials 2017, 10, 542.
27. Jeong HR, Hwang JH, Lee JK. Effectiveness of autogenous tooth bone used as a graft material for regeneration of bone in miniature pig. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;37:375–9.
28. Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Um IU, Lim SC, et al. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:496–503.
29. Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hróbjartsson A, Kirkham J, Jüni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schünemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919
Published
2021-08-26
How to Cite
KHABADZE, Zurab et al. Immediate Autogenous Extracted Tooth as a Grafting Material For Fresh Socket Preservation: a Systematic Review.. Journal of Oral Research, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 3, p. 1-7, aug. 2021. ISSN 0719-2479. Available at: <https://joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/joralres.2021.027>. Date accessed: 23 sep. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2021.027.
Section
Reviews