Flipped learning for teaching biostatistics to peruvian dental students.

  • Teresa Evaristo-Chiyong Depto. Académico de Estomatología Preventiva y Social. Fac. de Odontología. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima-Perú.
  • Manuel Mattos-Vela Depto. Académico de Estomatología Preventiva y Social. Fac. de Odontología. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima-Perú.


Objective: To evaluate the effect of the application of a flipped learning model for teaching biostatistics to dental students in a Peruvian public university. Methodology: A quasi-experimental, crossover, longitudinal and prospective design was used. A non-probability sampling technique was employed. The sample consisted of 63 students that enrolled in the Biostatistics course at the School of Dentistry at Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Students were divided into two groups according to their designated training schedule. The contents of two units were assessed. For the first unit (descriptive statistics), the first group was taught using the flipped learning model and the second group with the master class model. For the second unit (inferential statistics), groups were crossed over. At both periods of the study, cognitive, procedural and attitudinal skills were assessed through previously validated questionnaires. Mann-Whitney U test, Cohen is d and multiple linear regression analysis were performed. Results: the mean total score for the second unit was higher (p<0.001) in the flipped learning group (32.58) compared to the master class guided training group (27.94), presenting a Cohen’s d=0.97. Procedural (9.23 versus 7.80) and attitudinal (15.63 versus 12.90) skills were on average higher in the flipped learning group. Regression analysis resulted in R2=0.245, p=0.003. Conclusion: the flipped learning method achieved a higher content learning in the second unit, compared to the master class model.


1. García L, Uned. Bases, mediaciones y futuro de la educación a distancia en la sociedad digital. 1st Ed. Madrid, España: Ed Sintesis; 1999.
2. Kellesarian SV. Flipping the Dental Anatomy Classroom. Dent J. 2018;6(3):pii: E23.
3. Park SE, Howell TH. Implementation of a flipped classroom educational model in a predoctoral dental course. J Dent Educ. 2015;79(5):563–70.
4. Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):38.
5. Roach T. Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and activel earning in economics. Int Review Economics Educ. 2014;17:74–84.
6. Kyu M, Mi S, Khera O, Getman J. The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university:an exploration of design principles. Internet and Higher Education. 2014;22:37–50.
7. Sengel E. To FLIP or not to FLIP: Comparative case study in higher education in Turkey. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016:547–55.
8. Bohaty BS, Redford GJ, Gadbury-Amyot CC. Flipping the Classroom: Assessment of Strategies to Promote Student-Centered, Self-Directed Learning in a Dental School Course in Pediatric Dentistry. J Dent Educ. 2016;80(11):1319–27.
9. Findlay-Thompson S, Mombourquette P. Evaluation of a flipped classroom in an undergraduate business course. BEA. 2014;6(1):63–71.
10. Galway LP, Corbett KK, Takaro TK, Tairyan K, Frank E. A novel integration of online and flipped classroom instructional models in public health higher education. BMC Medical Education. 2014;14:181.
11. Ihm J, Choi H, Roh S. Flipped-learning course design and evaluation through student self-assessment in a predental science class. Korean J Med Educ. 2017;29(2):93–100.
12. Thai NTT, De Wever B, Valcke M. The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers and Education. 2017;107:113–26.
13. Ramazan Y. Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom. Comput Human Behav. 2017;70:251–60.
14. Nishigawa K, Omoto K, Hayama R, Okura K, Tajima T, Suzuki Y, Hosoki M, Shigemoto S, Ueda M, Rodis OMM, Matsuka Y. Comparison between flipped classroom and team-based learning in fixed prosthodontic education. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(2):217–22.
15. Simpson V, Richards E. Flipping the classroom to teach population health: Increasing the relevance. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015;15(3):162–7.
16. McLaughlin JE, Griffin LM, Esserman DA, Davidson CA, Glatt DM, Roth MT, Gharkholonarehe N, Mumper RJ. Pharmacy student engagement, performance, and perception in a flipped satellite classroom. Am J Pharm Educ. 2013;77(9):196.
17. Evaristo CT. Calidad de vida y su relación con el rendimiento académico según características sociodemográficas de estudiantes de odontología. Peru: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; 2012.
18. Figueroa C, Acuña R, Quiroz L, Navarrete M, Roa D, Rodríguez F. Factores asociados al rendimiento académico de estudiantes de la carrera de Fonoaudiología, en el año 2015, Temuco. Rev Educ Cienc Salud. 2018;15(1):12–5.
19. Criollo M, Romero M, Fontaines-Ruiz T. Autoeficacia para el aprendizaje de la investigación en estudiantes universitarios. Psicología Educativa. 2017;23(1):63–72.
20. Schwartz TA. Flipping the statistics classroom in nursing education. J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(4):199–206.
21. Strayer JF. The effects of the classroom flip on the learning environment: a comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that used an intelligent tutoring system. Estados Unidos de América: The Ohio State University; 2007.
22. Butt A. Student views on the use of a flipped classroom approach: evidence from Australia. BEA. 2014;6(1):33–43
How to Cite
EVARISTO-CHIYONG, Teresa; MATTOS-VELA, Manuel. Flipped learning for teaching biostatistics to peruvian dental students.. Journal of Oral Research, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 159-165, may 2019. ISSN 0719-2479. Available at: <https://joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/joralres.2019.025>. Date accessed: 03 aug. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2019.025.