The evaluation of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement with the addition of 45S5 bioactive glass using two conventional methods.

  • Maryam Shirazi Assistant Professor of Orthodontics, Dental Caries Prevention Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.
  • Mahsa Sadeghi General Dentist, Student Research Committee, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: There is a high prevalence of enamel caries around brackets due to the young age of the majority of orthodontic patients, and to the difficulty of plaque removal in presence of orthodontic appliances. Recently, protective agents such as bioactive glasses (BGs) were introduced to enhance remineralization and prevent demineralization of tooth structures.  This study aimed to assess the shear bond strength (SBS) of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) with addition of 45S5 BG to enhance its remineralizing potential using two conventional methods. Material and methods: This in-vitro experimental study evaluated three groups (n=20) of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel using Transbond XT (group 1), light-cure RMGIC (group 2) and RMGIC with BG added (group 3). Samples underwent 7000 thermal cycles and their SBS was measured. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was also determined. Quantitative data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA while qualitative data were analyzed using a chi-square test. Discussion: The results showed no significant difference in SBS between study groups, however the ARI scores were significantly different among the groups. The RMGIC group showed the highest ARI while RMGIC doped with BG showed the lowest ARI score. Conclusion: Addition of 30% w/v 45S5 BG to RMGIC does not cause a significant change in SBS of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel, while resulting in less amount of luting agent remnants on the enamel surface after debonding. 

References

1. Wheeler AW, Foley TF, Mamandras A. Comparison of fluoride release protocols for in-vitro testing of 3 orthodontic adhesives. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:301-9.
2. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 2016;7(3):pii: E16.
3. Hitmi L, Muller C, Mujajic M, Attal JP. An 18-month clinical study of bond failures with resin-modified glass ionomer cement in orthodontic practice. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120(4):406-15.
4. Cardoso MV, Delmé KI, Mine A, Neves Ade A, Coutinho E, De Moor RJ, Van Meerbeek B. Towards a better understanding of the adhesion mechanism of resin-modified glass-ionomers by bonding to differently prepared dentin. J Dent. 2010;38(11):921-9.
5. Xu X, Burgess JO. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of fluoride-releasing materials. Biomaterials. 2003;24(14):2451-61.
6. Prabhakar AR, Paul M J, Basappa N. Comparative Evaluation of the Remineralizing Effects and Surface Micro hardness of Glass Ionomer Cements Containing Bioactive Glass (S53P4):An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2010;3(2):69-77.
7. Hench LL. The story of Bioglass. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006;17(11):967-78.
8. Yli-Urpo H, Närhi M, Närhi T. Compound changes and tooth mineralization effects of glass ionomer cements containing bioactive glass (S53P4), an in vivo study. Biomaterials. 2005;26(30):5934-41.
9. Hu S, Chang J, Liu M, Ning C. Study on antibacterial effect of 45S5 Bioglass. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009;20(1):281-6.
10. Heravi F, Bagheri H, Rangrazi A, Zebarjad SM. Incorporation of CPP-ACP into Luting and Lining GIC: Influence on Wear Rate (in the Presence of Artificial Saliva) and Compressive Strength. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2016;2(11):1867-71.
11. De Caluwé T, Vercruysse CW, Ladik I, Convents R, Declercq H, Martens LC, et al. Addition of bioactive glass to glass ionomer cements: Effect on the physico-chemical properties and biocompatibility. Dent Mater. 2017;33(4):e186-e203.
12. Maruo IT, Godoy-Bezerra J, Saga AY, Tanaka OM, Maruo H, Camargo ES. Effect of etching and light-curing time on the shear bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Braz Dent J. 2010;21(6):533-7.
13. Jurubeba JEP, Costa AR, Correr-Sobrinho L, Tubel CAM, Correr AB, Vedovello SA, et al. Influence of Thermal Cycles Number on Bond Strength of Metallic Brackets to Ceramic. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(2):206-9.
14. Wilson AD. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Int J Prosthodont. 1990;3(5):425-9.
15. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 2000;16(2):129-38.
16. Foley T, Aggarwal M, Hatibovic-Kofman S. A comparison of in vitro enamel demineralization potential of 3 orthodontic cements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;121:526–30.
17. Sfondrini MF, Cacciafesta V, Pistorio A, Sfondrini G. Effects of conventional and high-intensity light-curing on enamel shear bond strength of composite resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119(1):30-5.
18. Silverman E, Cohen M, Demke RS, Silverman M. A new light-cured glass ionomer cement that bonds brackets to teeth without etching in the presence of saliva. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;108(3):231-6.
19. Yli-Urpo H, Närhi T, Söderling E. Antimicrobial effects of glass ionomer cements containing bioactive glass (S53P4) on oral micro-organisms in vitro. Acta Odontol Scand. 2003;61(4):241-6.
20. Yang SY, Piao YZ, Kim SM, Lee YK, Kim KN, Kim KM. Acid neutralizing, mechanical and physical properties of pit and fissure sealants containing melt-derived 45S5 bioactive glass. Dent Mater. 2013;29(12):1228-35.
21. Culbertson BM. Glass-ionomer dental restoratives. Progress in Polymer Science. 2001;26(4):577-604.
22. Crisp S, Lewis B, Wilson A. Characterization of glass-ionomer cements: 2. Effect of the powder: liquid ratio on the physical properties. Journal of Dentistry. 1976;4(6):287-90.
23. Yli-Urpo H, Lassila LV, Närhi T, Vallittu PK. Compressive strength and surface characterization of glass ionomer cements modified by particles of bioactive glass. Dent Mater. 2005;21(3):201-9.
24. Matsuya S, Maeda T, Ohta M. IR and NMR analyses of hardening and maturation of glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res. 1996;75(12):1920-7.
25. Ana ID, Matsuya S, Ohta M, Ishikawa K. Effects of added bioactive glass on the setting and mechanical properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Biomaterials. 2003;24(18):3061-7.
26. Tanbakuchi B, Hooshmand T, Kharazifard MJ, Shekofteh K,and Arefi A.Shear Bond Strength of Molar Tubes to Enamel Using an Orthodontic Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Modified with Amorphous Calcium Phosphate. Front Dent. 2019;16(5):369–78.
27. Patil Sayam, Vaz Anna , Jakati Sanjeev V. Comparison of shear bond strength between conventio nal orthodontic composite, resin modified gic and nano-ceramic restorative composite. Research Journal of Life Sciences, Bioinformatics, Pharmaceutical and Chemical Sciences. 2017;3(4):190-207.
28. Carvalho RCC, Carvalho NMP, Herênio SS, Oliveira Bauer JR, Paiva AEM, Costa JF. Evaluation of shear bond strength of orthodontic resin and RMGI cement on bonding of metal and ceramic brackets. RSBO. 2012;9(2):170-6.
29. Amirabadi GHE, Shirazi M, Shirazi Z. Effect of Saliva Contamination on Shear Bond Strength of Transbond XT and Assure Universal Bonding Resin to Enamel J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2014;26(3):163-9.
30. Amirabadi GHE, Shirazi M, Shirazi Z. Microshear Bond Strength of Transbond XT and Assure Universal Bonding Resin to Stainless Steel Brackets, Amalgam and Porcelain. J Islam Dent Assoc Iran. 2015;27(1):1-5.
31. Diaz-Arnold AM, Williams VD, Aquilino SA. The effect of film thickness on the tensile bond strength of a prosthodontic adhesive. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66(5):614-8.
32. Cehreli ZC, Kecik D, Kocadereli I. Effect of self-etching primer and adhesive formulations on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127(5):573-9.
33. Reynolds J. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171-8.
34. Khoroushi M, Keshani F. A review of glass-ionomers: From conventional glass-ionomer to bioactive glass-ionomer. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2013:10(4):411-20.
35. D’Attilio M, Traini T, Iorio DD, Varvara G, Festa F, Tecco S. Shear bond strength, bond failure, and scanning electron microscopy analysis of new flowable composite for orthodontic use.Angle Orthod. 2005;75:410-5.
1. Cheng HY, Chen CH, Li CL, Tsai HH, Chou TH, Wang WN. Bond strength of orthodontic light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(2):180-4.
37. Retief DH. Failure at the dental adhesive-etched enamel interface. J Oral Rehabil. 1974;1(3):265-84.
38. Lopez JI. Retentive shear strengths of various bonding attachment bases. Am J Orthod. 1980;77(6):669-78.
39. Jurubeba JEP, Costa AR, Correr-Sobrinho L, Tubel CAM, Correr AB, Vedovello SA, Crepaldi MV, Vedovello M Filho. Influence of Thermal Cycles Number on Bond Strength of Metallic Brackets to Ceramic. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(2):206-9.
Published
2020-10-26
How to Cite
SHIRAZI, Maryam; SADEGHI, Mahsa. The evaluation of shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement with the addition of 45S5 bioactive glass using two conventional methods.. Journal of Oral Research, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 4, p. 250-258, oct. 2020. ISSN 0719-2479. Available at: <http://joralres.com/index.php/JOR/article/view/joralres.2020.066>. Date accessed: 01 dec. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2020.066.
Section
Articles